Google, YouTube Parent Company Admits Biden Officials Pushed for Censorship.

**Alphabet Admits Biden Administration Pressured YouTube to Censor Misinformation**

In a recent letter to U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, Alphabet—the parent company of Google and YouTube—acknowledged that the Biden administration exerted pressure on the company to censor misinformation. The letter, penned by Alphabet’s attorney Daniel F. Donovan of King and Spalding, also revealed that YouTube will restore posting privileges to users who were previously removed for questioning the official narrative surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the integrity of elections—particularly the 2020 presidential election that reportedly delivered over 80 million votes to Joe Biden.

### Subpoena and Committee Probe

The admission comes in response to a subpoena attached to a letter from Chairman Jordan, sent to Alphabet in March. Jordan highlighted that during the 118th Congress, the oversight committee uncovered evidence that the Biden-Harris administration repeatedly pressured online platforms—including YouTube, Facebook, and Amazon—to censor Americans’ speech directly and through proxies.

Jordan wrote:

> “Alphabet admitted that it was wrong to bow to the Biden-Harris Administration’s demands, publicly committed to restoring free speech on its platforms, and reformed its policies. However, Alphabet has not similarly disavowed the Biden-Harris Administration’s attempts to censor speech.”

To guide legislative reforms aimed at protecting Americans’ civil liberties, the committee stressed the need to fully understand the extent and nature of these censorship efforts. The committee’s investigation uncovered that YouTube directly assisted the administration’s censorship regime. According to Jordan, the administration successfully pressured YouTube to remove lawful content that did not violate the platform’s policies.

### Alphabet’s Confession

In his letter released today, Donovan explained that senior Biden administration and White House officials made repeated, sustained efforts to influence YouTube’s content moderation decisions:

> “While the company continued to develop and enforce its policies independently, Biden Administration officials continued to press the company to remove user-generated content that did not violate its policies.”

Donovan detailed how the political climate fostered by the administration—including comments from President Biden—created pressure to act against what officials considered misinformation. Remarkably, Donovan also acknowledged that these efforts were unacceptable and wrong, emphasizing that Alphabet consistently resisted the Biden administration’s censorship on First Amendment grounds.

The letter further admitted that YouTube had removed content related to COVID-19 but clarified that the platform neither allowed fact-checkers to monitor nor control content directly.

Highlighting YouTube’s commitment to diverse perspectives, the letter noted that YouTube has sunsetted a previous policy restricting discussion of potential widespread fraud, errors, or glitches in the 2020 and past U.S. presidential elections.

Regarding user removals, Alphabet confessed:

> “The company terminated channels for repeatedly violating community guidelines on elections integrity content through 2023 and COVID-19 content through 2024. Today, YouTube’s community guidelines allow for a wider range of content regarding COVID-19 and election integrity.”

In a nod to free speech, YouTube is now offering creators whose channels were removed for violating outdated policies on COVID-19 and election-related content an opportunity to rejoin the platform.

YouTube affirmed its recognition of conservative voices, acknowledging that these creators have substantial reach and play an important role in civic discourse.

### Broader Efforts: Twitter Files and Government Involvement

YouTube was not the only platform targeted by the Biden administration’s censorship efforts. Twitter (now rebranded as X) was another major platform under scrutiny, as revealed by the “Twitter Files” released by Elon Musk after acquiring the company.

Journalist Matt Taibbi reported that the effort to silence conservative voices on Twitter involved cooperation with agencies such as the FBI and Pentagon. The files showed the FBI functioning as a gatekeeper to a vast government program aimed at social media surveillance and censorship, involving multiple federal agencies including the State Department, Pentagon, and CIA.

The situation grew even more alarming when the IRS visited Taibbi’s home on the very day he testified before Chairman Jordan’s committee. Jordan wrote to IRS Chief Daniel Werfel stating:

> “While Mr. Taibbi was describing his findings of government abuse and civil liberties violations, an IRS revenue officer appeared at Mr. Taibbi’s residence in New Jersey, leaving a note to call the IRS four days later.”

It was later revealed that the IRS had rejected Taibbi’s 2018 and 2021 tax returns due to suspected identity theft but failed to inform him or his accountant of these concerns until the day of his congressional testimony.

Taibbi expressed that the internet was originally meant to democratize global information exchange. However, the Twitter Files exposed a sweeping government-led effort to undermine that vision by employing machine learning and other techniques to convert the internet into a tool for censorship and social control. Even more troubling, according to Taibbi, is the active role of the U.S. government in this endeavor.

—

This unfolding story highlights significant tensions between government influence, corporate content moderation, and free speech rights on major online platforms. As investigations continue, the public and lawmakers alike are paying close attention to the implications these revelations have on civil liberties and the future of digital discourse.
https://thenewamerican.com/us/google-youtube-parent-company-admits-biden-officials-pushed-for-censorship/